July 3, 2008 10:57 AM PDT

Yahoo's top U.S. sites get traffic help from Google search

A fresh look at Yahoo's search results Thursday by Hitwise Intelligence raises the question of whether Yahoo could survive just fine without its search engine.

Such a question is rather important to Yahoo investors, given the Internet search pioneer has given a cold shoulder to Microsoft, which has previously expressed interest in buying Yahoo's search assets. Yahoo, however, rebuffed the offer, noting in its investor presentation that selling its search assets, including its algorithmic search, would:

Jeopardize the Yahoo user experience and make it difficult for Yahoo to maintain search and display volume.

But Heather Hopkins, vice president of research for Hitwise, noted in her blog that Yahoo's valuable sites would not necessarily fair poorly without Yahoo's search engine.

Hopkins took Yahoo's top 20 U.S. Internet properties for the month of June and ranked them, based on user traffic.

As expected, Yahoo Mail represented a 37.5 percent slice of the traffic pie, followed by the main Yahoo site with 30.6 percent and Yahoo search with 12.l percent.

Then Hopkins compared whether these top 20 sites were getting their users by way of a Google search or a Yahoo search. In all but six of the top 20 sites, more users were coming to Yahoo's top 20 sites by way of a Google search--even to its popular Yahoo Mail and Yahoo.com.

Yahoo Answers showed the disparity the most, with 49 percent of its U.S. traffic coming from Google in June, while only 20 percent was from a Yahoo search.

Hopkins made this observation in her blog:

I'll admit, I went into this analysis thinking that the data would show that Yahoo was worth more together--I thought that the sum of the whole would be greater than the parts. However after looking more closely at the data, I'm not sure that is necessarily true.

Whether Yahoo is better kept whole or split up I can't say. What I can say is that the parts of Yahoo are quite valuable and wouldn't necessarily be lost without the search engine.

Wonder if Yahoo has read Hopkins' blog?

Recent posts from News Blog
Woman to virtual ex: 'I won't be ignored!'
Swiss secret sauce to power green choppers
iLink to deliver answers to military online communities
Vonage names new CEO
T-Mobile 'Gekko' officially reveals itself as T-Mobile Sidekick
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 3 comments
by BIGELLOW July 3, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
By keeping their own search, but monetizing search ads better by using the deal they're trying to make with Google, in the long run they would make more money with their search engine than Microsoft is willing to pay to buy it off of them. Could they survive without search? Sure. But the goal of doing business is to make more money, not "just survive." Either way, they'll survive. By turning down Microsoft and keeping their search engine, then working with Google, they'll not only survive... they'll make more money. Microsoft knows this. Microsoft is just trying to make a quick buck... Yahoo should keep that quick buck for themselves.
Reply to this comment
by flickrz July 3, 2008 6:14 PM PDT
Yahoo!,
Don't loose Yahoo! Search. It is one of the best search engines out there. Especially the "Glue Pages" on yahoo india search.
Reply to this comment
by blabtech July 6, 2008 10:56 AM PDT
In regards to yahoo in general, i think its a good company with good insight on great news!

http://blabtech.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right